The Society of Homeopaths aims to publish within seven working days of a decision the names of those members in respect of whom it has investigated allegations and found the allegations to be well founded. It will also publish alongside the finding both the section(s) of the Code of Ethics and Practice of which they were found to be in breach, and the steps (if any) taken by the Adjudication Panel in respect of the member so named.
Orders imposed by the Adjudication Panel have been made to:
- Fulfil the Society’s role to protect members of the public
- Maintain public confidence in the profession of homeopathy
- Uphold the standards and conduct expected of Members
What the orders mean
Formal First Warning (F) – A member if given a formal warning which will remain on their file for a specified time agreed by the Panel.
Action Plan (A) – The member should agree upon an action plan to improve practice with the Professional Conduct Officer. Checks will ensure that the action plan is then followed.
Interim Suspension Order (I) – An allegation is serious enough for the member to be suspended pending an investigation and the outcome of the case.
Conditions of Practice (C) – conditions have been imposed on the member’s practice to enable him/her to take steps to remedy any deficiencies in their practice. Restrictions may be placed on the types of work that they may undertake. Conditions of practice judgements are sometimes imposed where there is evidence of incompetence or significant shortcomings in a member’s practice, but where the Committee is satisfied that there is potential for the member to respond positively to re-training and supervision.
Suspension (S) – the Panel has ordered that the member may not practise as a member of the Society of Homeopaths for a specified period of time. During this time he/she forgoes all rights and privileges of Society membership.
Termination (T) – this is the most severe sanction. The individual is no longer a member of the Society of Homeopaths.
Indicative Sanctions click here
Adjudication Panel decisions
This section contains details of homeopaths who have recently been the subject of a decision by either the Preliminary Investigation Panel or the Adjudication Panel and the sanction imposed. The committee has the power to issue a formal first warning and create an action plan, impose conditions of practice, suspend the homeopath’s registration for a set period, or permanently remove the homeopath’s name from the Register.
|Homeopath’s name||Registration number||Order/s||Order/s|
|Akkik Patel||2256||T||An Adjudication Panel was convened on 29th June, 2017 to hear a complaint that had been brought by a member of the public against Akkik Patel RSHom. The complaint was upheld and the Panel found that Ms Patel was in breach of the Code of Ethics and Practice in respect of the following Sections:|
Section 1 - Key principles for practice:
s1.5 - Work to foster and maintain the trust of individual patients and the public
s1.9 - Provide comprehensive clear balanced information to allow patients to make informed choices
s1.13 - Respond promptly and constructively to concerns, criticisms and complaints
Section 2 - The patient/practitioner relationship
Section 3 - Professional obligations
19 - The patient has the right to know and the homeopathis obliged to offer, the name of any prescribed remedies. Where a patient expressly requests not to know the name of the remedy the homeopath should record their wish in their notes.
|Trevor Gunn||G00140||T||An Adjudication Panel was convened on 24th November 2014 to hear a complaint that had been brought by the Society of Homeopaths against Trevor Gunn RSHom. The complaint was partly upheld and the Panel found that Mr Gunn’s behaviour had breached the Code of Ethics and Practice in respect of the following Sections.|
|Section 1 – Key principles for practice:
s1.4 Work to foster and maintain the trust of individual patients and the public.
Section 6 – Practice Issues
s59 Where the conduct of any registered, or student clinical member may have an adverse impact on their reputation as a homeopath and or the reputation of homeopathy such matters may be brought to the attention of the Professional Conduct Committee for their consideration.The Panel recommended that Trevor Gunn’s interim suspension order should be lifted. That as a condition of Mr Gunn’s continued membership of The Society he should;
Mr Gunn should inform the chair of the Panel, of the name of the supervisor he intends to see by the end of January 2015. The supervisor should be selected from the list of supervisors approved by The Society.
31/01/2015 Membership terminated for failing to comply with PC Panel decision.
|Carol Ingram||2007||T||An Adjudication Panel was convened on 21st May 2014 to hear a complaint that had been brought by a member of the public against Carole Ingram RSHom. The complaint was upheld and the Panel found that Ms Ingram’s treatment of the complainant’s son had breached the Code of Ethics and Practice in respect of the following Sections:|
Key principles for practice:
s1.7 Comprehensively record any history the patient may give and the advice and treatment the registered or student clinical member has provided.s1.8Provide comprehensive clear and balanced information to allow patients to make informed choices.s1.15 Practise in accordance with the Core Criteria for Homeopathic Practice and the Complementary and Natural Healthcare National Occupational Standards for Homeopathy.
2 Performance Criteria
15 – Explore and evaluate with individuals factors relating to their health and well-being within the context of homeopathy
15.7 – The nature of disability and the role of the practitioner in working with individuals who have disabilities
15.8 – The relevant legislation, professional standards and codes of conduct
15.9 – How to obtain consent from individuals in accordance with legal and professional standards
15.12 - Approaches and techniques for eliciting information (eg open questions) and appropriate combinations/sequence of approaches at different times during consultation
15.19 - How to record information accurately for assessment and treatment purposes
15.24 – The procedures for record keeping in accordance with legal and professional requirements
15.25 – The principles and consequences of treating like with like and using minimum dose
15.26 – The importance of getting full information on both presenting problems and relevant contextual factors for effective homeopathic treatment
15.27 – The scope and significance of the physical, mental, emotional, social, spiritual and environmental factors which should be explored with individuals, including:
15.29 – Homeopathic criteria against which to evaluate information given by individuals in order to focus further questioning and discussion
15 Performance criteria
16 – Integrate and evaluate information about individuals’ health and well-being within the context of homeopathy
16.5 - Principles and methods of categorising symptoms, including:
16.6 - The relative value of symptoms and patterns in terms of:
16.7 – The nature, purpose and importance of prognosis in homeopathy, and how this differs from conventional medical prognosis
16.8 – Factors to consider when evaluating a case, including:
16 Performance criteria
2. encourage individuals to provide further information and/or agree how such information can be obtained if necessary
3. evaluate the information using strategies which are:
4. use appropriate homeopathic strategies to analyse and integrate all of the information available to prioritise the most characteristic symptoms and patterns in the case
17 – Prescribe homeopathic treatment for individuals
17 Performance criteria
19 – Review and evaluate homeopathic treatment, case management and practice development
19 Performance criteria